When you think of Venice, you think of canals. I take that as a given. But unless you are a maniac for old maps, you may not have noticed how many towers punctuate the city.
Many (most?) medieval cities in Europe were spikier than a drove of porcupines, and the Venetian skyline in the 1730 engraving can still be discerned. I was all set to blame Napoleon for any that are missing, but he was focused primarily on despoiling churches, not dismantling towers.
The prime destroyer was lightning. It took Venice a surprisingly long time — i.e., more than one disaster — to address the problem of lightning’s propensity to ignite a disastrous fire, but eventually lightning rods were installed on many belltowers. (Along the same lines, gunpowder was originally stored in the Arsenal, and strange to say it took more than one lightning bolt for the administrators to grasp the importance of storing it on neighboring islands. One such island is called San Angelo delle Polvere — Saint Angelo of the Powder. The wisdom of storing gunpowder outside the city was confirmed on August 29, 1689, when lightning struck the island and all 800 barrels exploded.)
Back to towers. There are a few churches whose bells (or budget) didn’t even merit a tower. Exhibit A: The magnificent basilica of SS. Giovanni e Paolo.
Indulge me as I conduct roll call. I will follow the sequence of church names printed in Latin below the engraving, but I’ll translate them into the common Italian versions we know. The German names, printed above the towers, will be left for you to decipher for whatever weird crossword you may be working that actually asks for this information.
Bear in mind that the image shows three dimensions, so don’t think the churches are all lined up like the Rockettes at Radio City Music Hall, meaning no disrespect. To churches or Rockettes.
Italy, like many other parts of Europe, has been pounded by intense heat the past month or so. Maybe more. It all begins to blur.
So to the usual end-of-summer entropy we add debilitating temperatures. Outraged articles in the press, here and abroad, have focused largely on the usual tourist scourge, but I feel more than usually sorry for them, especially their little children. If the little ones aren’t at the beach, they shouldn’t be here at all, wandering the sweltering, exhausting, meaningless streets with no end in sight. But I digress.
I have seen an assortment of diverting little moments and things, so here are some of them. They contain no meaning or significance of any sort except that I like them. If that counts as significance.
I will have to let you know whatever improvement is made on the ill-fated footpath rectangle. I think it would be excellent for them accept that people want to cross there, and to install one of those wooden walkways that you see in swamps. Maybe plant the rest of the area with (finish this sentence please).
The story about making money off tourists has taken a few turns since my recent post. It would probably be more accurate to call the following characters “short-term visitors” rather than tourists, because their purpose in being here does not resemble in any way whatever the typical tourists are seeking.
First, there are what journalist Elisio Trevisan, in his report for the Gazzettino, calls “beggar-commuters.” We are now learning that an increasing number come to Venice from various Eastern European points on what you might call, not a vacation, really, but a sort of brief work-abroad project. They come on the cheap Flixbus (which is great, by the way), set themselves up as beggars, eat at the community soup-kitchens, sleep in doorways, and can make as much as 100 euros per day. They manage to wash up at some public source of water before the return trip (the bus driver won’t let them board otherwise) and go home to their families with enough to live on till the next trip becomes necessary.
Then there are the regular thieves. They too are coming from elsewhere; they also are not exactly tourists, but tastes on vacations vary. Some people take a break and go surfing, or look at the Mona Lisa, or run with a batch of bulls, while these intrepid pilferers come to Venice to steal for a while. According to Carlo Mion writing in La Nuova Venezia, they come over from Lombardy, the region next door, and are usually organized by family or clan.
The Carabinieri have been studying them and their systems. They are basically from the Balkans and eastward (Romania, Croatia, Serbia, Bulgaria, and also a contingent of Roma). They dress in a credible way; the women wear panama hats and big scarves (to cover their faces from surveillance cameras), daypack hoisted on their chests and with a city map in hand (to cover their busy hands). Also, they look very touristy this way. Favorite targets: Americans, Koreans, Japanese. During one brief shining period there were also cash-laden Russians. In any case, a clever faux-tourist can gather as much as 300 euros in a day.
In one recent case, it was 700 euros. Two Bulgarian women lifted the wallet (that also included her documents such as passport, I assume, and perhaps also credit cards) of an 80-year-old American woman. The victim wasn’t aware of anything amiss, so I don’t know who raised the hue and cry. In any case, the filchers were taken away by whichever uniformed officer was on duty. The hearing is scheduled for the end of July — “in theory.” That doesn’t sound encouraging. In any case, whatever happens, they will be back. Or their friends and relatives.
Years ago there was a spate of street gamblers playing the shell game around the city, especially on the Accademia Bridge. (This sort of thief has not reappeared so far.) I read in the newspaper that one day lightning-fingers managed to milk a gullible player of $5,000. It’s not funny in any way, but I have to admit that, at least in this case, that the victim, as well as his trickster, must have become a LEGEND in that Serbian family. Every couple of months somebody will want to hear uncle tell the story again of that time in Venice he peeled the money off the tourist and that’s how come they’re living in such a nice house, with a garden and two cars. A boisterous toast to uncle and tourist.
I hope this is the last time I’ll be droning on about the situation. So just take every precaution, and then take some more.
More advice on protecting yourself from pickpockets (other than staying at home, under the bed).
Where else is your wallet at risk? At the automated vaporetto-ticket machines. By the time you’ve finished deciphering and following the instructions, your worldly goods may well have moved on. If not yet, the pickpockets have seen where you put your wallet. Getting through the turnstiles is sufficiently distracting that you won’t notice that they are right behind you as you pass through.
“In very crowded areas,” my friend explained, “they get so close to you, you don’t even know they’ve opened your bag.”
Another thing: “Crossing crowded bridges is another way to get your bag opened up,” etc. etc. etc.
I have no doubt that all this information and advice is valid also in Florence, Rome, Milan, and any other city that attracts lots of people. They don’t have to all be tourists, there just have to be lots of them and the thieves have their cover.
Tour guides have been stolen from — one German guide was pickpocketed inside the basilica of San Marco. The spouses of tour guides have been ditto ditto. On especially busy days (for example, from now till October) there are hundreds of these incidents a day.
Don’t bother pining for the good old days under the doge and the Council of Ten. As Lino occasionally remarks, “They used to cut the thief’s hand off. He kept stealing anyway.”