The Garden of the Forgotten Venetians: Pier Luigi Penzo

One of the most notable monuments in the Giardini — in its position, and in itself — is of Venetian aviator Pier Luigi Penzo.  Like his next-door neighbor, Francesco Querini, he too was involved in Arctic exploration and met a very distressing, unexpected, undeserved, all the “un”s you want, end.  Yet somehow his story lacks some crucial element that makes Querini’s so riveting.  I think it’s because the real focus of attention was on someone else.

The inscription reads: ACCANTO AL MARMO DI FRANCESCO QUERINI QUI VUOLSI ONORATA E COMPIANTA L’ALA DEL VENEZIANO PIER LUIGI PENZO SORVOLATA SU L’ARTIDE CADUTO NEL RODANO NATO A VENEZIA 5 MAGGIO 1896 MORTO A VALENCE IL 29 SETTEMBRE 1928.”  “Beside the marble of Francesco Querini here it is desired to be honored and lamented the wing of Venetian Pier Luigi Penzo Flown above the Arctic Fallen in the Rhone Born in Venice 5 May 1896 Died 29 September 1928.”  The eagle and anchor represent his status as a Navy pilot before passing to the Air Force.
Although the words don’t exactly soar, one can admire the design of the lettering. On a more modest note, it appears that the encroachment of the shrub is eventually going to cover the words completely if someone doesn’t intervene with the pruning shears.
He looks entirely like someone who deserves a monument, though of course monuments tend to do that.

The barest outlines of his tale are that he participated in a massive rescue operation in the vicinity of the North Pole in 1928; on his flight home his plane struck some power lines near Valence, France and broke apart.  It fell into the Rhone River, from which his remains were recovered two weeks later some 50 km (31 miles) downstream.  I have found surprisingly little to add to that summary; Google searches mercilessly return articles about the Venetian soccer stadium, named — another sort of memorial — for him.

Therefore, and meaning no disrespect, you might be wondering why this person, who admittedly met a premature and unmerited demise, should have been given such an impressive monument.  (In fact, two of them — the other is on the cemetery island of San Michele.)

I’m glad you wondered, because while the ill-fated expedition he was sent to rescue is lavishly described in numerous documents, not to mention a film (“The Red Tent,” 1969), Penzo himself seems not to have been the hero, but a team player in the grand sweep of several tragedies.  I must describe these tragedies — some technical, some human, some political — in order to clarify why Penzo was literally put on a pedestal. Emotions of all sizes and sorts had been running extremely high.

The Gazzettino, then a weekly, published this portrait of the 32-year-old Penzo a few weeks after his death.  He was posthumously awarded the silver medal of the Air Force.

In drastically condensed form, we pick up the tale of Italian efforts to reach the North Pole in the autumn of 1925, when Norwegian explorer Roald Amundsen asked General Umberto Nobile of the Italian Royal Air Force to collaborate with him on a flight to the North Pole; Amundsen wanted to be the first to reach it by air.  More to the point, he wanted to fly in a semi-rigid airship, and Nobile was already well-known as an important aeronautical engineer, pilot, and fervent proponent of dirigibles.

Nobile designed and piloted the airship Norge, accomplishing the first verified trip of any kind to reach the North Pole and likely the first verified flight from Europe to North America (Svalbard, Norway to Teller, Alaska) over the polar ice cap. This feat was known as the Amundsen-Ellsworth 1926 Transpolar Flight, so named for Lincoln Ellsworth who, with the Aero Club of Norway, financed the expedition.  On May 12, 1926 at 1:30 AM GMT the North Pole was reached (though not actually touched).  The flags of Norway, Italy, and the United States were dropped onto the ice and the airship proceeded to Alaska.

With the success of this exploit Nobile then planned another polar overflight, this time with an all-Italian crew in a dirigible named Italia.  The project, however, met strong headwinds from his many enemies in the Fascist government, some of whom were also enemies of airships but huge fans of rigid aircraft.  After grudgingly approving the expedition, Captain Italo Balbo, then-Secretary of State for the Air Force (later Minister of the Air Force), wished him a special bon voyage: “Let him go,” he is reported to have said, “for he cannot possibly come back to bother us anymore.”

The expedition went splendidly for a while.  On May 23, 1928, after a 69-hour flight to the Siberian group of Arctic islands, the Italia began its flight to the North Pole with Nobile as both pilot and expedition leader. On May 24, the airship reached the Pole and began its homeward trip to Svalbard when it ran into a storm.

Rapidly losing altitude in the struggle against real headwinds, the next day the Italia crashed onto the pack ice fewer than 30 kilometers (18 miles) north of Nordaustlandet (astern part of Svalbard).

Of the 16 men in the crew, ten were thrown onto the ice as the gondola was smashed; without the weight of the gondola, the buoyant superstructure began to float away with six crewmen still inside it who, as they drifted skyward, threw all the supplies they could manage out onto the ice, which saved the lives of their severely injured comrades.  The six were never seen again.

The disaster’s horror was intensified, if such a thing were possible, by the desperation of the month-long search for the survivors.

The men on the ice sent calls for help via a radio transceiver salvaged from the shattered gondola, but 30 days passed with no response.  While a variety of the usual Arctic horrors were befalling them, an international rescue operation was seeking them — Soviet Russia, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Italy, not to mention privately owned ships which had been chartered by polar scientists and explorers. Even Roald Amundsen put aside his bad feelings toward Nobile and boarded a French seaplane to aid in the rescue efforts.  The plane disappeared between Tromsø and Svalbard, and though a pontoon from the craft was later found, the bodies of Amundsen and all aboard were not.

Enter Major Pier Luigi Penzo, joining the search on June 23, 1928 in his Marina II, an SM55-Dornier Wal hydroplane. Born in Malamocco, he had enrolled in the Italian Royal Navy at the age of 20, and earned his hydroplane pilot’s license at the seaplane base at Sant’ Andrea, just across from the Lido.  He distinguished himself in combat on the Piave front in World War 1, and had become one of the most requested aerial rescue pilots then active.  He was also well-known to Italo Balbo — I suppose you could say he was a friend — with whom he had flown on several occasions.

The “idroscalo,” or seaplane base, at Sant’ Andrea was where Penzo earned his hydroplane pilot’s license.  There was a flourishing waterborne airmail route between Torino and Trieste in the Twenties, mostly following the rivers (Ticino, Po) till reaching Venice.

In the end, the survivors’ signals were picked up by a Russian ham radio operator who alerted the search teams, and it wasn’t even Penzo who spotted them for the first time, but fellow pilot Umberto Maddalena.  And the first rescue plane to land was a Swedish Air Force Fokker ski plane piloted by Lieutenant Einar Lundborg.

Nobile had prepared a detailed evacuation plan, with the most seriously wounded man (the heavily built mechanic Natale Cecioni) at the top of the list and himself as number 4.  But Lundborg refused to take anyone but Nobile, who also had been injured.  Lundborg argued that the plane could only take one passenger, and Cecioni was so heavy the pilot was unsure he could take off.  So Nobile was airlifted to safety, a captain who, it can’t be denied, had clearly not chosen to go down with his ship (so to speak).  When Nobile boarded the Italian ship that served as expedition headquarters, he was arrested.

Worse still, when Lundborg returned alone to pick up the next survivor his plane crashed on landing, and he was left on the ice with the other five.

Meanwhile, Penzo and his crew (as well as another hydroplane) undertook a series of flights over the icepack dropping supplies and instruments to the marooned men.  I can’t give any details on whether he took any survivors back to base.

After 48 days on the ice, the last five men of his crew were picked up by the Soviet icebreaker Krasin.

Time to leave?  Nobile insisted that he wanted to stay to continue the search for the six men who were swept away in the airship when it disintegrated, but was ordered back to Rome with the others.  He was to discover that the Arctic catastrophe wasn’t over, because it had given his enemies their chance to eliminate him.

When he and his men arrived in Rome on July 31, they were greeted by 200,000 cheering Italians.  The popular exultation at the happy ending of the agonizing drama momentarily baffled Balbo and his allies, who had been seeding the foreign and domestic press with accusations against Nobile, claiming that agreeing to be evacuated first was an obvious sign of cowardice.  (Pause to wonder why, in fact, Lundborg had insisted on taking him off before everybody else.)  The official inquiry gave them the chance to place the blame for the disaster entirely on his shoulders.  He was accused of abandoning his men, and Balbo went so far as to call for his execution by firing squad for treason and cowardice.  Instead, Nobile resigned his commission and went to the United States, returning only in 1943 when Balbo was dead.

Here is a fuller, though still concise, account of the Italia disaster.

Italians of Lino’s vintage were raised with the conviction that Umberto Nobile was a craven poltroon, but this stamp commemorating the 90th anniversary of the expedition shows the “Italia” proudly aloft.

So, as I mentioned, there were tragedies:  The technical tragedy was the crash of the “Italia”; the human tragedy was the loss of life; the political tragedy, as I see it, was the destruction of Nobile’s reputation.  I don’t say he was right to be evacuated first, but the fact that the attacks on him were politically motivated is revolting.

In the months between the departure of the survivors in July and his own departure in September, Penzo remained at King’s Bay to continue the search for Amundsen, as well as for the six men lost in the envelope that floated away.  In these flights he didn’t use his usual hydroplane, but a Macchi 18 biplane hydro-bomber (I throw that in for any aviation fans who might be reading).  Unsuccessful in both cases, he was finally ordered back to Italy.

On September 27 (Thursday) he sent a telegram to his family that he was on his way home, and his brothers left Venice for Pisa, where his plane was expected to land on Friday.  But it did not.

On Sunday morning a functionary of City Hall delivered the bad news to his wife.  Two of his crew had survived the crash and been saved by fishermen, but Penzo and another two crewmen drowned.  His remains were interred on the cemetery island of San Michele, under a honking big monument.

The memorial to Penzo is located in the section dedicated to the military.  The eagles appear to want to be artichokes.
The inscription in Latin identifies Petrus Alojsius Penzo April 6 1896 September 29 1928.  Following his date of death is inscribed “E.F. VI,” for the sixth year of the Era Fascista (Fascist Era).  The oak leaves above his head typically symbolize power, endurance and strength (also humble beginnings, which would certainly be apt for Malamocco); they’re often seen on military tombs.
This interesting device is easy enough to decipher: The propellers and compass rose for aviation, the bear symbolizes the Arctic, and the corpse floating on the water would represent the victim.
The other side of the monument isn’t much less impressive.
“ASSUMENT PENNAS UT AQUILAE  VOLABUNT ET NON DEFICIENT.” “They shall take wings as eagles, they shall run and not be faint.”  Here the famous phrase from the book of Isaiah 40:31 is attributed simply to the “prophets.”
“VIVENT MORTUI TUI + INTERFECTI TUI RESURGENT.” ‘Thy dead men shall live; thy slain men shall be raised.” (The Book of Wisdom).

But wasn’t enough; another memorial, in a more public place, was seen as desirable, and it was unveiled at an inauguration ceremony on June 1, 1932 by — of course! — Italo Balbo, then Minister of the Air Force.  He had organized an international aviation conference in Rome, and added Venice to the program.

It was obviously correct for him, in his official capacity, to honor a fallen comrade, but he must have enjoyed the chance to castigate Nobile once again by glorifying a man who had lost his life in the effort, more or less, to save him.  At least that’s how I interpret this extravagant conclusion to Penzo’s life.

The monument was designed by Venetian sculptor Francesco Scarpabolla (1902-1999).  “Oh sure,” said Lino when I shared this information.  “I knew him, he lived just down the street from me near San Vio.”  We were all expecting that by now, naturally.

But the best monument to Penzo, to my way of thinking, isn’t either one of the statues, nor even the soccer stadium (sorry).  It’s the elementary school at Malamocco, which bears his name.  Latin quotations and oak leaves are all very well, but the school is dedicated to a local boy, and it’s there that his name will truly be kept alive.

I will trek down to Malamocco one of these days and make some photographs of the school. Meanwhile, here is map evidence that it exists.

Continue Reading

Tourist quantity, postscript

I neglected to include photos of another “ripple effect” of tourism: Most of the fruit and vegetable vendors at the Rialto Market are making ends meet by selling packages of dried pasta-sauce mix.  These have somewhat replaced the formerly ubiquitous packages of colored pasta (aquamarine fusilli, etc.), but in any case are aimed at the same public.

No need to say more.

A typical stall at the Rialto Market; at least half the space is dedicated to the pasta-sauce packages. And, like the illegal handbags that once were omnipresent, the packages from stall to stall are exactly the same.
Long tubes….
… or flat packs, the contents don’t vary. But people like them. Is this a likely gift item for your friends back in Eek, Alaska?
It’s like a colored tide has overwhelmed the market, with dried stuff and seasonings instead of algae.
People must like them, otherwise there wouldn’t be so much. This was an unknown product until just the past few (three?) years. You could probably create a simple graph delineating the increase of these and tourists, and the decrease of everybody else.  I guess you know that you could make virtually the same dish from scratch, and it would taste better.  But the packages are indeed very colorful.

 

Continue Reading

Does tourism make you crazy? Part 2: Quantity

Empty Venice. It exists, but you have to get up really early to see it.

Another headline repeats what is becoming accepted wisdom: “Tourism is killing Venice, but it’s also the only key to survival.”

Apart from my inborn tendency to balk at the word “only” (in this case, is it true, or is tourism the only key you’ve come up with?), the phrase itself makes the same sense as “We had to destroy the village in order to save it.”  “The operation was a success, but the patient died.”  “Arsenic can kill you, but it’s the only thing we have to treat your late-stage trypanosomiasis.”  Why do I keep linking tourism to death?  That’s not good.

The quantity of tourists, as so many things, can be measured as “enough,” “more than enough,” and “far too much.”  Sometimes these estimates are subjective (“I personally can’t find a seat anymore at my favorite cafe’, therefore there are too many people here”) to the clearly objective, like those overloaded Asian ferries that sometimes sink.

This has not been Photoshopped; it was 6:00 AM on a May morning and it was divine, but only if you see this scene as empty of tourists.  If you see it as empty of Venetians, not so much.

Venice’s plight is not unique.  There are increasing numbers of places which are now under pressure from what once was a good thing, and they are trying different ways of managing it.  Easter Island, if you’re interested, recently faced the fact that it was being subjected to a “veritable invasion of foreigners.”  The 8,000 residents held a referendum and agreed to limit a tourist’s stay to 30 (as opposed to the previous 90) days, and soon will decide on a maximum number of tourists to allow at any one time, period.

Tourism to Iceland — a slightly less remote place — has increased five-fold since 2010.  The population of Iceland is 332,000, and last year counted some 2,000,000 visitors.  A tax is being discussed which would be applied in various ways to protect the spectacular natural environment from what amounts to six tourists for every resident.

Consider the gorgeous Croatian coastline.  Rovinj, to take an example at random, has a population of 15,000; in 2017 there were 490,000 arrivals.  Istria, the Croatian peninsula nearest to Italy, contains 208,000 residents; in 2017 there were 1,022,171 tourists from Germany alone.

Well, you say, when the shock has subsided, those are mostly summer destinations; obviously there’s breathing room there in the winter.  And that’s true.  But Venice is mostly a summer destination too.

Venice, so fragile, so small, obviously is facing its own perils, many based on chronic perplexity as to how to manage a place which has too many visitors to permit normal life, but which stubbornly insists on maintaining normal life anyway.  Plans for peaceful coexistence that are hopefully suggested usually run aground on the reef of how to implement them.  And there’s no way to ever make the city larger than three square miles.

One almost can’t recognize places that aren’t full of people.

Studies have shown that the sustainable limit of tourists to Venice is 19,000,000 a year.  Last year 28,000,000 came, which is almost 50 percent more than the limit.  The above study calculates that therefore Venice can sustain 52,000 tourists per day.  We now have 77,000 per day.  My own personal studies confirm that they will all be on the #1 vaporetto heading uptown on Sunday afternoon.

Speaking of vaporettos, they’re not your only option if you want to be crushed.  Now the buses to Mestre in the late afternoon are reaching critical mass.  So many tourists are packing the buses heading back to their much-less-expensive hotels, apartments, campgrounds, or wherever they’re staying on the mainland, that daily commuters literally can’t get on.

And if this is happening now, let me draw your attention to the several enormous hotels being built right next to the Mestre train station.  Presumably their guests are going to want to go to Venice sometime, and even come back from Venice, on the already insufficient buses and probably soon-to-be-insufficient trains.  Anybody is welcome to defend tourism, but I urge you once again not to say “Oh, but Venice lives on tourism” to any of the exhausted Venetians trying to get home as they watch the bus pull away without them.

The city government is struggling to find solutions to all this; it’s not like they don’t see what’s going on.  The mayor recently announced that in the busiest periods he might close certain sections of the city to further entry.  Something like this was tried a few months ago with “gates” at critical points, such as the Calatrava Bridge and the entrance to the Lista di Spagna, which were to slow, and redirect, the flood of arrivals heading toward San Marco from Piazzale Roma and the train station.  It got mixed reviews and now the gates have been removed, though New Year’s Eve and Carnival desperation may require them to be reinstated.

Every time the topic of some form of entry tickets is raised, a thousand objections are heard.  Entry is certainly easier to control at Easter Island, which is reachable only by means of a five-hour flight from Chile, but there must be at least 20 ways to get to Venice if you really want to, including, but not limited to, swimming.

I suppose winter could be considered one method of crowd control.

Managing crowds is an art and a science; the most striking example I know of is the reorganization of traffic in Mecca during the seven days of the annual hajj.  Venice hasn’t reached the point where individuals are being trampled to death, but that was already a danger for the 2,000,000 Muslim pilgrims all trying to get to the same places together.  A system has now been created to manage the flow better, so now we know it’s possible.  It’s a fascinating story; here is a link to an interesting article on this amazing feat.

The lions awaiting the daily surge.

But “too many tourists” isn’t just numbers, it’s the ripple effect they have on Venetian life.  I have recently noticed three effects of escalating tourism that are profound, even if not immediately perceived as such.

The first effect is the astonishing recent increase in supermarkets.  A supermarket used to be a novelty, now it seems to have become a human right.  There are even two, virtually side by side, on the Riva del Carbon near the Rialto Bridge.

I thought it would be interesting to find a map, or a list of the total number of supermarkets, but I didn’t and I don’t really care.  They’re everywhere now.  There’s the De Spar at the ex-Cinema Italia and literally two steps away is a Coop.  Not literally ten steps away is a Conad, which used to be a Billa.  Prix has inserted itself into all sorts of interesting corners, making it a challenge to find some of them although the lower prices make the search worthwhile, and there is a chain called Simply and something called Crai and so on.

If one knows — which one does — that the population of Venice is inexorably shrinking by about 1,500 people per year (despite a recent light touch on the brakes), it’s obvious that all these supermarkets haven’t been opening to support the few remaining locals.  But when you consider the extreme increase of apartments being rented to tourists, voila’!  I get it!

It’s clear that the dwindling population, including me, benefits from the supermarkets too.  My point is merely that there wouldn’t be this number of emporia if locals were their only customers.  Even I can understand that.  But as I stand in line at the drastically expanded Coop on via Garibaldi it’s obvious that more than half of the people with me are tourists.  And as I dodge their backpacks (yep, still on their backs, just like on the vaporetto) as they navigate the narrow aisles, I ask myself where the Sam Hill they all came from.  I don’t mean what countries, I mean why are they all here now when five years ago there were so few? It’s like there’s a factory somewhere on a dark side street that’s manufacturing tourists.

There are many, subtle, and increasing ways in which the rise in tourism can be seen.  In this case the butcher, who usually writes his notes in either Italian or Venetian, has added a word of English.  It can’t be there for the locals.

The second effect is the astronomical increase in apartments for short-term tourist rentals.  By now this is not a new theme, but as I have often observed, you can hate AirBnb all you want (and it is far from the only outfit in this business), but if apartments are constantly being added to the supply available to tourists (and tourists respond by renting them, of course), why are these apartments being offered?  To make money, naturally.  And who is offering them?  The Venetian landlords, naturally.  While everyone is excoriating tourists for killing Venice, one should recognize who is handing them the ammunition.  The shots, so to speak, are coming from inside the house.

One starts with the fact that there is very little space for locals to rent.  The available space, which is increasing, is now primarily offered only to tourists.  Some years ago, when Lino and I were requested to vacate the apartment we had rented for ten years, the landlady said she needed it for her cousin, or somebody, moving to Venice from Sicily, or somewhere.  Any excuse will do, because of course she planned to rent it to students, which she did, demanding four times the rent we paid.  Not made up.

But let that go.  When we went looking for another rental somewhere — we weren’t fussy — no agency would talk to us because Lino’s Venetian (hence, theoretically impossible to dislodge).  My being a foreigner was fine, as far as that went, but the point is that we weren’t in a position to pay the tourist-rental rates of — I think one agent said — 1,000 euros per week.

We managed, in the end, to buy our little hovel (we gave up on the rental idea), but we could manage.  Yet there are extremely aged Venetians (a retired 90-year-old professor, in one case) who are being summarily evicted by their landlords because the apartment, which has now become a four-wall gold mine, is wanted for tourist rentals.  The landlord says “I want my apartment back,” and a person who has been living in the place for 50 or 60 years is out on the street.  There is no recourse.  I am not making any of this up.  A friend of mine told me a similar story of an elderly person in her building, “And the landlord is renting two other apartments already.”

This often-tragic upheaval is a clear response to the sheer quantity of tourists, but fingers in the press are pointed at the tourists.  Why?  As Lino puts it: “Who is forcing the Venetians to leave?  The Venetians!”  Therefore, if you look around and all you see is tourists, there are reasons.

A group called Occupy Venice has come forth with the goal of re-appropriating empty apartments (that is, those whose fate has not yet been sealed by tourism).  A friend has sent an article which you can peruse.

This lady is definitely not from around here. There’s nothing wrong with what she’s doing — in fact, I envy her — but her non-local characteristics are (A) being alone and (B) reading a book. I wouldn’t say that being outside is unusual; people here certainly enjoy hanging around outdoors, but they’re virtually always with friends, and that precludes book-reading.  If they manage the Gazzettino it’s already something; taking time to savor “The Polish Bandit; Or, Who Is My Bride?,” or whatever she’s reading, is a foreign custom.
On the other hand, while it’s possible that a tourist might wash sheets, it’s impossible to imagine that he or she would take the time to wash curtains and a collection of fabulous doilies. I’m putting my money on a Venetian here.

The third sign of increased tourism may not matter to anybody but me, so you can skip the next few paragraphs if you want.

I saw it on the day of the Regata Storica.  This event focuses on four races which gloriously but inconveniently occupy the Bacino of San Marco and the Grand Canal for a total of three hours in the afternoon.  This deranges the vaporetto routes, of course, and this year it was decided (one always wonders by whom) that this derangement was no longer acceptable.  Therefore, for the first time in at least 100 years, the traditional “boa” in front of the train station was moved further downstream to just before the Cannaregio Canal.

“So what?” you ask.  The “boa” is a temporary object which the racers turn around in order to head back down the Grand Canal toward the finish line.  Tradition has always placed it in front of the train station, where there’s plenty of room for the boats to maneuver and plenty of room on the piazza in front of the station from which tourists can watch this usually dramatic moment.  Win-win for everybody?

Of course not, because now there are enough tourists (or even some locals, I guess) who don’t care about the races and who are inconvenienced by not having vaporetto service from Piazzale Roma up the Cannaregio Canal during those few hours.  One might regard the Regata Storica as the city’s festival, but no longer does the entire city celebrate.

Therefore moving the boa enabled the vaporettos to continue to navigate the upper reaches of the Grand Canal, unhindered by those pesky races.  So another intangible, but no less real or important, piece of Venetian life has just been distorted (I didn’t want to say “eliminated,” but eliminated) for the benefit of I actually do not know whom.  Because for many decades this temporary interruption of service didn’t create insurmountable problems for anyone.  Does this change mean that now the number of “anyone” has superseded the number of those who want to see the Regata?  Evidently yes.

The newspaper chronicles the craziness of the tourists, but crazier things keep happening below the proverbial radar.  As in the case of the Fondaco, it’s the people in offices who actually have the destiny of the city in hand, and it will be a cold day in the Inferno when any regular Venetians might be consulted on the matter.  But why consult them?  Before long they’re all going to be dead.  So bring on the tourists!

We need to move out of this dark tunnel now; I have a happy story to tell you.

Summer dawn. What more can one say?

A few days ago Lino and I were on the vaporetto going down the Grand Canal; it was late afternoon, that delectable moment in which you feel the heat of the day almost imperceptibly begin to subside and the faintest zephyr of coolness sweep over your sticky skin.

There were seats along each side of the boat’s bow, and everybody wants to sit there, of course: the view, the breeze, the general feeling of being the figurehead of the ship.  The four forward-most seats on our side were occupied by a family, with the boy and his father on the left, the girl and her mother on the right.  They weren’t talking much, mostly just relaxing and looking at the incomparable panorama as we trundled along.  Tourists, of course, but calm, coherent tourists, acting like normal people.

As we passed the Customs House Point, where the Bacino of San Marco opens up to splendor on every side, the man reached across and touched his wife.  She looked back and took his outstretched hand, and they silently squeezed, and smiled, gazing out at the glory.

Watching this, everything fell back into perspective and I was suddenly glad they were here.  They weren’t just another four tourists, they were people who saw the beauty, and they were happy.  It seemed that so many thoughts and emotions were being exchanged in that instant and I unexpectedly could imagine myself in their place, and I remembered how Venice made me feel the first time I came here, and I wanted that for everybody.

If all those too-many people who came to Venice could feel what they felt, then maybe we could find another word for them and stop calling them TOURISTS.

 

Continue Reading

The triumph of the laundry

This was what greeted me just down the street.  It was like a trumpet fanfare.

Of course I’m obsessed with laundry — mine, and everybody else’s.  Not to sound weird, but out in the rest of the world where clothes dryers are normal, your clothes do what you tell them to do.

Here, where you have only wind and sun to work with, the wet things have the upper hand; you have to learn to collaborate both with the elements and your garb.  The time frame is different.  Their behavior is different (do you want more heat, or more breeze? Have you got drenched denim or terrycloth? Will ironing later finish the job?). Maybe it’s because I’m used to a dryer that I have come to feel I have to adjust myself to their demands, and not vice versa.

I don’t know that everybody approaches their laundry in this way — people here have grown up with clotheslines — but I have to calculate how much the humidity is going to slow things down even if the sun is shining, while figuring that a cold, cloudy day can work out fine, if there’s the right wind.  Not too cold a day, of course; one winter evening I took in the towels and they were frozen hard as boards.  Which wouldn’t matter except that when they defrosted, they were wet again.

I also have to take into account the fact that the sun shines directly on my clothesline for just about one hour from noon to 1:00 PM, depending on the season.  Those precious 60 minutes have to be made to count.  I position the underwear in the sun with more precise calculation than any woman on the beach developing her tan.

The apotheosis of the sheets.

As all the world know, Monday morning is sacred to laundry.  But yesterday morning must have been the date, unknown to me, of some sacred ritual, because every calle in the neighborhood was festooned with laundry. It seemed that everybody (man or woman) had received some occult signal and washed everything in their house.

IT WAS DAZZLING!  They ought to make it an annual festival!  I’ll bring my mattress pad, hooded bathrobe, waffle-weave blanket, and five pairs of jeans and join the bacchanal.  Or are those at night?  Never mind.  I’ll be there just the same.  Maybe there’ll be a bonfire I can dance around, flapping my soggy beach towel.

Even the shadows of people’s raiment are entertaining.  Could be a song: “The Shadow of your Shirt.”
This load of laundry is never going to dry.
Continue Reading